我们的目标是讨论其在其理论和实践术语中讨论了强化的计划，指出了在讨论计算模拟的优势的同时实施这些时间表的实际限制。在本文中，我们展示了一个名为喙的R脚本，建立了模拟与加固时间表交互的行为速率。使用喙，我们已经模拟了允许评估不同强化反馈功能（RFF）的数据。这是通过无与伦比的精确度制作的，因为模拟提供了巨大的数据样本，更重要的是，它产生的加强不会改变模拟行为。因此，我们可以系统地改变它。我们将不同的RFF与RI​​时间表进行了比较，用作标准：意义，精确，分析和一般性。我们的结果表明，RI计划的最佳反馈函数由BAUM（1981）公布。我们还建议Killeen（1975）使用的模型是RDRL计划的可行反馈函数。我们认为喙铺平了更多了解加强时间表，解决了关于时间表的定量特征的开放问题。此外，他们可以指导将来使用时间表作为理论和方法工具的实验。

The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps.

Text classification is a natural language processing (NLP) task relevant to many commercial applications, like e-commerce and customer service. Naturally, classifying such excerpts accurately often represents a challenge, due to intrinsic language aspects, like irony and nuance. To accomplish this task, one must provide a robust numerical representation for documents, a process known as embedding. Embedding represents a key NLP field nowadays, having faced a significant advance in the last decade, especially after the introduction of the word-to-vector concept and the popularization of Deep Learning models for solving NLP tasks, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), and Transformer-based Language Models (TLMs). Despite the impressive achievements in this field, the literature coverage regarding generating embeddings for Brazilian Portuguese texts is scarce, especially when considering commercial user reviews. Therefore, this work aims to provide a comprehensive experimental study of embedding approaches targeting a binary sentiment classification of user reviews in Brazilian Portuguese. This study includes from classical (Bag-of-Words) to state-of-the-art (Transformer-based) NLP models. The methods are evaluated with five open-source databases with pre-defined data partitions made available in an open digital repository to encourage reproducibility. The Fine-tuned TLMs achieved the best results for all cases, being followed by the Feature-based TLM, LSTM, and CNN, with alternate ranks, depending on the database under analysis.

Chronic pain is a multi-dimensional experience, and pain intensity plays an important part, impacting the patients emotional balance, psychology, and behaviour. Standard self-reporting tools, such as the Visual Analogue Scale for pain, fail to capture this burden. Moreover, this type of tools is susceptible to a degree of subjectivity, dependent on the patients clear understanding of how to use it, social biases, and their ability to translate a complex experience to a scale. To overcome these and other self-reporting challenges, pain intensity estimation has been previously studied based on facial expressions, electroencephalograms, brain imaging, and autonomic features. However, to the best of our knowledge, it has never been attempted to base this estimation on the patient narratives of the personal experience of chronic pain, which is what we propose in this work. Indeed, in the clinical assessment and management of chronic pain, verbal communication is essential to convey information to physicians that would otherwise not be easily accessible through standard reporting tools, since language, sociocultural, and psychosocial variables are intertwined. We show that language features from patient narratives indeed convey information relevant for pain intensity estimation, and that our computational models can take advantage of that. Specifically, our results show that patients with mild pain focus more on the use of verbs, whilst moderate and severe pain patients focus on adverbs, and nouns and adjectives, respectively, and that these differences allow for the distinction between these three pain classes.

底面图像中的自动化视盘（OD）和光杯（OC）分割与有效测量垂直杯盘比率（VCDR）是一种在眼科中常用的生物标志物，以确定胶状神经神经病变的程度。通常，这是使用粗到1的深度学习算法来解决的，其中第一阶段近似于OD，第二阶段使用该区域的作物来预测OD/OC掩码。尽管这种方法广泛应用于文献中，但尚无研究来分析其对结果的真正贡献。在本文中，我们介绍了使用5个公共数据库的不同粗到精细设计的全面分析，包括从标准分割的角度以及估算青光眼评估的VCDR。我们的分析表明，这些算法不一定超过标准的多级单阶段模型，尤其是当这些算法是从足够大而多样化的训练集中学习的。此外，我们注意到粗糙阶段比精细的OD分割结果更好，并且在第二阶段提供OD监督对于确保准确的OC掩码至关重要。此外，在多数据集设置上训练的单阶段和两阶段模型都表现出对成对的结果，甚至比其他最先进的替代方案更好，同时排名第一的OD/OC分段。最后，我们评估了VCDR预测的模型与Airogs图像子集中的六个眼科医生相比，以在观察者间可变性的背景下理解它们。我们注意到，即使从单阶段和粗至细节模型中恢复的VCDR估计值也可以获得良好的青光眼检测结果，即使它们与专家的手动测量不高度相关。

最近证明利用稀疏网络连接深神经网络中的连续层，可为大型最新模型提供好处。但是，网络连接性在浅网络的学习曲线中也起着重要作用，例如经典限制的玻尔兹曼机器（RBM）。一个基本问题是有效地找到了改善学习曲线的连接模式。最近的原则方法明确将网络连接作为参数，这些参数必须在模型中进行优化，但通常依靠连续功能来表示连接和明确的惩罚。这项工作提出了一种基于网络梯度的想法来找到RBM的最佳连接模式的方法：计算每个可能连接的梯度，给定特定的连接模式，并使用梯度驱动连续连接强度参数又使用确定连接模式。因此，学习RBM参数和学习网络连接是真正共同执行的，尽管学习率不同，并且没有改变目标函数。该方法应用于MNIST数据集，以显示针对样本生成和输入分类的基准任务找到更好的RBM模型。

我们介绍了IST和Unmabel对WMT 2022关于质量估计（QE）的共享任务的共同贡献。我们的团队参与了所有三个子任务：（i）句子和单词级质量预测；（ii）可解释的量化宽松；（iii）关键错误检测。对于所有任务，我们在彗星框架之上构建，将其与OpenKIWI的预测估计架构连接，并为其配备单词级序列标记器和解释提取器。我们的结果表明，在预处理过程中合并参考可以改善下游任务上多种语言对的性能，并且通过句子和单词级别的目标共同培训可以进一步提高。此外，将注意力和梯度信息结合在一起被证明是提取句子级量化量化宽松模型的良好解释的首要策略。总体而言，我们的意见书在几乎所有语言对的所有三个任务中都取得了最佳的结果。

工业X射线分析在需要保证某些零件的结构完整性的航空航天，汽车或核行业中很常见。但是，射线照相图像的解释有时很困难，可能导致两名专家在缺陷分类上不同意。本文介绍的自动缺陷识别（ADR）系统将减少分析时间，还将有助于减少对缺陷的主观解释，同时提高人类检查员的可靠性。我们的卷积神经网络（CNN）模型达到94.2 \％准确性（MAP@iou = 50 \％），当应用于汽车铝铸件数据集（GDXRAR）时，它被认为与预期的人类性能相似，超过了当前状态该数据集的艺术。在工业环境上，其推理时间少于每个DICOM图像，因此可以安装在生产设施上，不会影响交付时间。此外，还进行了对主要高参数的消融研究，以优化从75 \％映射的初始基线结果最高94.2 \％map的模型准确性。

对心脏周围环境的脂肪库的定量是评估与多种疾病相关的健康风险因素的准确程序。但是，由于人为的工作量，这种类型的评估并未在临床实践中广泛使用。这项工作提出了一种用于自动分割心脏脂肪垫的新技术。该技术基于将分类算法应用于心脏CT图像的分割。此外，我们广泛评估了几种算法在此任务上的性能，并讨论了提供了更好的预测模型。实验结果表明，心外膜和纵隔脂肪分类的平均准确性为98.4％，平均正面速率为96.2％。平均而言，关于分割的患者和地面真相的骰子相似性指数等于96.8％。因此，迄今为止，我们的技术已经获得了心脏脂肪自动分割的最准确结果。

TMIC是一种应用程序发明家扩展，用于部署ML模型，以在教育环境中使用Google Tochable Machine开发的图像分类。 Google Thotable Machine是一种直观的视觉工具，可为开发用于图像分类的ML模型提供面向工作流的支持。针对使用Google Tochable Machine开发的模型的使用，扩展TMIC可以作为App Inventor的一部分，以tensorflow.js为tensorflow.js导出的受过训练的模型，这是最受欢迎的基于块的编程环境之一，用于教学计算计算K-12。该扩展名是使用基于扩展图片的App Inventor扩展框架创建的，可在BSD 3许可下获得。它可用于在K-12中，在高等教育的入门课程中或有兴趣创建具有图像分类的智能应用程序的任何人。扩展TMIC是由Initiative Computa \ c {C} \ 〜Ao Na Escola的信息学和统计系的圣卡塔纳纳大学/巴西大学提供的研究工作的一部分，旨在在K-中引入AI教育。 12。